Symphyotrichum is a genus with ca. 90 species, native to the Americas and Eurasia. It is by far most diverse in North America where 77 species occur (Brouillet & al. 2006). Many American species are cultivated as ornamentals (so-called ‘asters’ or ‘michaelmas daisies’) outside their native distribution range. Several of these have become naturalized and are often considered environmental weeds. This genus is one of the many segregates of Aster L., a genus that was found to be polyphyletic (Nesom 1994). The new circumscription for the segregate genera now has become widely accepted, in the New as well as in the Old World (e.g. Brouillet & al. 2006, Jäger 2011, Tison & de Foucault 2014, etc.; see, however Stace 2010). Its application in horticultural taxonomy was inevitable (Shaw 2014).
Symphyotrichum is still very poorly understood in Belgium and the present account is a provisional one. Most species are much alike and – surely as a result of hybridization – more or less fade into each other. Therefore, the distribution and invasion history of Symphyotrichum in Belgium is insufficiently known. According to our current knowledge, Symphyotrichum lanceolatum and S. xversicolor appear to be the most widely dispersed species of the genus in Belgium, while all others are probably rare and often ephemeral or only very locally naturalized. Dirkse & al. (2014) demonstrated that in riparian habitats in the eastern part of the Netherlands, in addition to the widespread S. lanceolatum, at least two additional small-flowered species occur (S. ontarionis (Wiegand) G.L. Nesom and S. lateriflorum (L.) Á. et D. Löve).
The current treatment is chiefly based on recently observed Belgian populations. Some other taxa, some of unknown identity, have been observed in the past in Belgium (prior to 1950) but are no longer seen at present.
The number of cultivars, often of complex hybrid origin, is very high today and traditional taxonomy is no longer applicable to a large part of the asters currently sold in nurseries or garden centers (as cut-flowers or for planting) (Hetterscheid & van den Bergh 1996). Fortunately, taxa of Symphyotrichum usually found in the wild in Belgium are mostly “pure” species or at least species with a more or less well-defined hybrid origin. With the key beneath most populations will key-out although some will turn out to pertain to complex hybrid swarms.
In Belgium several species of Symphyotrichum are noxious environmental weeds. Reproduction is chiefly (probably even exclusively) non-sexual, the species being dispersed by strong clonal growth. Viable seed is probably only rarely (if ever) produced in Belgium. Symphyotrichum is usually introduced via garden waste or from transported or washed-up rhizomes. It seems to be invasive mostly in riparian habitats, where Symphyotrichum lanceolatum seems to be the usual species (see, however, Dirkse & al. 2014).
In addition to the species included in this account some others are worth mentioning.
Symphyotrichum subulatum (syn.: Aster squamatus (Spreng.) Hieron.), formerly exceptionally recorded as a wool alien in the Vesdre valley, is rapidly expanding in Europe and recently reached the British Isles (e.g. Green 2007) and the Netherlands (see: http://waarneming.nl/waarneming/view/89832886). It is a bushy annual with numerous, small heads with inconspicuous ligular florets. Its re-occurrence in Belgium in a very near future is likely. Symphyotrichum parviflorum (Nees) Greuter (syn.: Aster parviflorus Nees) is an enigmatic small-flowered taxon. Historical records of this species were cited by Hoffman (1996) from Belgium (“Bei Verviers an der Vesdre”). However, Nees’ Aster parviflorus is now considered part of the Symphyotrichum subulatum complex (e.g. http://www.tropicos.org). The exact identity of the plants formerly found near Verviers is uncertain but it is clear that the name Aster parviflorus was misapplied for them. They may be mere small-flowered forms of S. lanceolatum (var. interior (Wiegand) Nesom??) (see also Dirkse & al. 2014). Finally, a peculiar low-growing ‘species’ of Symphyotrichum is often cultivated and has been recorded as a more or less established throw-out. It shares features of both S. dumosum (L.) Nesom and S. novi-belgii (L.) Nesom and possibly represents their hybrid. It was well-established between basalt rocks in Oostende (Spuikom) but this population was recently destroyed after infrastructural works (2013).
Up-to-date information on asters and related genera is available here: https://uwaterloo.ca/astereae-lab/research/asters.
1 Heads disciform (ligular florets absent or inconspicuous). Annual. Tubular florets whitish === Symphyotrichum ciliatum
Heads radiate (ligular florets present, conspicuous). Perennial. Tubular florets usually yellow (at least at beginning of anthesis) === 2
2 Inflorescence branches, involucral bracts and leaves glandular hairy (with numerous multicellular hairs) === S. novae-angliae
Plants entirely eglandular (without multicellular hairs) === 3
3 Corolla lobes distinctly longer than tube (lobe/limb ratio 50-75%). Flowers small (ligule ca. 4-5 mm long), often congested and in more or less one-sided arrays === S. lateriflorum
Corolla lobes distinctly shorter than tube (lobe/limb ratio < 35%). Flowers usually larger, not in one-sided arrays === 4
4 Plants densely hirsute-hairy throughout (not hairy in lines). Ligular florets always white. Involucral bracts with apex involute, spine-like. Caespitose (plants appearing singly) === S. pilosum var. pilosum
Plants sparsely hairy (hairs in lines) to subglabrous. Ligular florets mauve, bluish, purplish or white. Involucral bracts flat at apex, never spine-like. Colonial (plants appearing in dense stands) === 5
5 Upper cauline leaves sessile but not clasping stem. Ligular florets usually white (drying bluish), less frequently pink or blue. Involucral bracts very unequal, 0,5-0,7 mm wide, the median green part very narrow === S. lanceolatum
Upper cauline leaves slightly clasping stem to distinctly amplexicaul. Ligular florets mauve, bluish or purplish, rarely white. Involucral bracts 0,7-1 mm wide === 6
6 Involucral bracts markedly unequal, the outer ca. ½ to ¾ as long as the inner, the whitish hyaline border extending to ca. upper 1/3 of the bract (central green patch confined to upper 1/3 of the bract). Leaves often amplexicaul, ovate, at most 5x as long as wide === S. xversicolor
Involucral bracts subequal, whitish hyaline border extending to upper ½ of the bract (central green patch often occupying the upper ½ of the bract or bract sometimes entirely green). Leaves only slightly clasping, lanceolate, 4-10x as long as wide === 7
7 Involucral bracts subequal, very loosely arranged, usually more than 0,7 mm wide. Leaves usually distinctly clasping, lanceolate === S. novi-belgii
Additional aliens: Symphyotrichum racemosum (S. Elliott) Nesom (syn.: Aster racemosum S. Elliott) (N-Am., garden escape) and S. subulatum (Michaux) Nesom s.l. (syn.: Aster subulatus Michaux; incl. S. squamatum (Spreng.) Nesom, syn.: A. squamatus (Spreng.) Hieron.) (Am., wool alien).
Adolphi K. (1995) Neophytische Kultur- und Anbaupflanzen als Kulturflüchtlinge des Rheinlandes. Nardus 2: 272 p.
Brouillet L., Semple J.C., Allen G.A., Chambers K.L. & Sundberg S.D. (2006) Symphyotrichum. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Flora of North America, vol. 20. Oxford University Press, New York-Oxford: 465-539.
Dirkse G.M., Reijerse A.I. & Duistermaat L. (2014) De ontrafeling van in Nederland ingeburgerde Amerikaanse herfstasters (Symphyotrichum Nees. subg. Symphyotrichum sect. Symphyotrichum, Asteraceae). Gorteria 37: 1-24.
Fehér A. (2008) Aster species from North America (Aster novi-belgii agg.). In: Bottadukat Z. & Balogh L. (eds), The most important invasive plants in Hungary. Vácrátót: Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences: 179-187.
Green P.R. (2007) Aster squamatus could be on its way to you. A new alien for Ireland and England. BSBI News 105: 31-32. [available online at: http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/BSBINews105.pdf]
Greuter W. (2003) The Euro+Med treatment of Astereae (Compositae) –– generic concepts and required new names. Willdenowia 33: 45-47. [available online at: http://www.bgbm.org/sites/default/files/documents/w33-1EuroMed-2.pdf]
Hawke R.G. (2013) A Comparative Study of Cultivated Asters. Plant Evaluation Notes 36: 1-11. [available online at: http://www.chicagobotanic.org/downloads/planteval_notes/no36_asters.pdf]
Haynes A. (2001) Clarifying the generic concepts of Aster sensu lato in New Enlgand (sic). Botanical Notes 7: 1-7. [available online at: http://static.squarespace.com/static/5369617de4b054aef368005b/t/53d9d25fe4b047a1cbd79103/1406784095874/Botanical_Notes_number_7.pdf]
Hetterscheid W.L.A. & van den Berg R.G. (1996) Cultonomy of Aster L. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45(2): 173-181.
Hoffman M.H.A. (1995) Aster (1). Dendroflora 32: 6-23.
Hoffman M.H. (1996) Die in Zentraleuropa verwilderten und kultivierten nordamerikanischen Astern. Feddes Repert. 107(3-4): 163-188.
Jäger E.J. (ed.) (2011) Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Gefäßpflanzen: Grundband. 20. Aufl. Heidelberg.
Jedlicka J. & Prach K. (2006) A comparison of two North-American asters invading in central Europe. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 201(8): 652-657.
Jones A.G. (1980) A classification of the New World species of Aster (Asteraceae). Brittonia 32: 230-239.
Jones A.G. & Hiepko P. (1981) The genus Aster s.l. (Asteraceae) in the Willdenow Herbarium at Berlin. Willdenowia 11: 343-360.
Jones A.G. & Young D.A. (1983) Generic concepts of Aster (Asteraceae): a comparison of cladistic, phenetic and cytological approaches. Syst. Bot. 81: 71-84.
Kovanda M. & Kubát K. (2004) Aster. In: Slavík B. & Štĕpánková (eds.), Kvĕtena České Republiky, vol. 7. Academia, Praha: 125-140.
Lambinon J. & Verloove F. (avec coll. Delvosalle L., Toussaint B., Geerinck D., Hoste I., Van Rossum F., Cornier B., Schumacker R., Vanderpoorten A. & Vannerom H.) (2012) Nouvelle Flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des Régions voisines (Ptéridophytes et Spermatophytes). Sixième édition. Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise: CXXXIX + 1195 p.
Meinert S., Ottich I. & Zizka G. (2009) Anthropochore Aster-Arten (Asteraceae) in Frankfurt am Main. Botanik und Naturschutz in Hessen 22: 91-106. [available online at: http://www.senckenberg.de/files/content/forschung/abteilung/botanik/phanerogamen1/meinert_ottich_zizka_bnh22_2009.pdf]
Nesom G.L. (1994) Review of the taxonomy of Aster sensu lato (Asteraceae: Astereae), emphasizing the New World species. Phytologia 77: 141-297. [available online at: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/46740#page/3/mode/1up]
Nesom G.L. (1995) Key to the American genera of Asterinae (Asteraceae). Phytologia 79: 281-285. [available online at: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/46844#page/3/mode/1up]
Nesom G.L. (1997) Taxonomic adjustments in North American Aster sensu latissimo (Asteraceae: Astereae). Phytologia 82(4): 281-288.
Oliver J. (1998) North American Asters in Wiltshire. Wiltshire Archaeol. Nat. Hist. Mag. 91: 128-138.
Sell P. & Murrell G. (2006) Flora of Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. 4 Campanulaceae – Asteraceae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: XXVIII + 624 p.
Semple J.C. et al. (2001) Chromosome number determinations in fam. Compositae, tribe Astereae. VI. Western North American taxa and comments on generic treatments of North American asters. Rhodora 103: 202-218.
Semple J.C. & Brouillet L. (1980) A synopsis of North American Asters. Am. J. Bot. 63: 1010-1026.
Semple J.C., Heard S.B. & Brouillet L. (2002) Cultivated and native asters of Ontario (Compositae: Astereae) Aster L. (including Asteromoea Blume, Diplactis Raf. and Kalimeris (Cass.) Cass.), Callistephus Cass., Galatella Cass., Doellingeria Nees, Oclemena E.L. Greene, Eurybia (Cass.) S.F. Gray, Canadanthus Nesom, and Symphyotrichum Nees (including Virgulus Raf.). University of Waterloo biology series; no. 41. Waterloo, Ont.: University of Waterloo: viii + 134 p.
Shaw J. (2014) The splitting of Aster. The Plantsman N.S. 13(2): 120-125. [available online at: https://www.rhs.org.uk/about-the-rhs/publications/magazines/The-Plantsman/2014-issues/june/the-splitting-of-aster]
Stace C. (2010) New flora of the British Isles, 3th ed.: XXXII + 1232 p. Cambridge University Press.
Thellung A. (1913) Die in Mitteleuropa kultivierten und verwilderten Aster- und Helianthusarten nebst einem Schlüssel zur Bestimmung derselben. Allg. Bot. Zeitschr. 19: 87-89, 101-112, 132-140.
Tison J.-M. & de Foucault B. (coord.) 2014) Flora Gallica. Flore de France. Editions Biotope, Mèze : xx + 1196 p.
Yatskievych G. (2004) How faster to master the Aster disaster: a primer on the changing nomenclature of Missouri Asters. Missouriensis 25: 26-32. [available online at: http://www.guynesom.com/AsterDisaster.pdf]
Yeo P.F. (1998) Aster L., Michaelmas Daisies. Plant Crib, 3 [available online at: http://www.bsbi.org.uk/Aster_Crib_3.pdf]
Yeo P.F. (2000) Aster. In: Cullen J. & al. (eds.), The European Garden Flora, vol. 6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 570-578.